A fresh wave of online criticism targeting David Kabanda has brought to the surface simmering rivalries within the Patriotic League of Uganda (PLU), casting new light on internal dynamics that have largely played out behind closed doors.
The social media exchanges, which gathered momentum over the weekend, included allegations questioning Kabanda’s political consistency and loyalty. His supporters quickly mounted a defence, accusing unnamed critics of attempting to undermine the organisation from within through coordinated digital attacks.
In a public response, Kabanda dismissed the accusations as “misinformation,” suggesting they were being amplified by individuals unwilling to move beyond earlier disagreements.
“This organisation was built on shared values,” he said. “We cannot permit division fueled by anonymous narratives.”
Sources familiar with PLU’s internal operations say competition over strategy, messaging and influence has occasionally generated friction among members. Although no formal disciplinary measures have been announced, the latest episode has triggered calls for structured dialogue and reconciliation within the movement.
The dispute has also drawn attention within circles aligned to the National Resistance Movement (NRM), reflecting the perceived ideological and structural links between the two formations.
Political analyst Grace Namara suggested the timing may not be coincidental. “As national political activity intensifies, internal alignments often begin to shift,” Namara observed. “This could represent early positioning rather than outright conflict.”
Despite the turbulence, PLU officials insist the organisation remains focused on its mobilisation agenda. Kabanda emphasised that disagreements should be resolved through internal channels rather than public digital exchanges.
Whether the latest online storm proves to be a temporary flare-up or signals a deeper internal recalibration remains unclear. What is evident, however, is that Uganda’s political contest increasingly extends into the digital sphere — where perception can be shaped as decisively as policy.
