KAMPALA — The Uganda Law Society has condemned what it describes as increasing intimidation and public attacks against lawyers representing clients in high-profile corruption cases, following online criticism directed at city lawyer Caleb Alaka over his legal representation of Speaker Anita Among.
In a statement issued by Uganda Law Society Vice President Asiimwe Anthony, the lawyers’ body warned against “public and extrajudicial attacks” targeting advocates solely because of the clients they represent, saying such actions threaten the independence of the legal profession and the administration of justice.
“The right to legal representation is a cornerstone of the rule of law and must be protected for all persons, regardless of the allegations they face or prevailing public opinion,” the statement said.
The controversy emerged after widespread online debate surrounding remarks reportedly made by Chief of Defence Forces Gen. Muhoozi Kainerugaba, who allegedly warned that lawyers defending individuals implicated in corruption scandals could face unspecified consequences.
Although the reported remarks have not been formally addressed by the Uganda People’s Defence Forces, they triggered sharp reactions within legal circles, with many advocates expressing concern over what they see as growing hostility toward defence lawyers handling politically sensitive cases.
The Uganda Law Society said advocates should not be subjected to threats, harassment, or social media campaigns because of their professional duties, stressing that legal representation does not amount to endorsement of a client’s alleged actions.
The body further noted that any complaints regarding the conduct of advocates should be pursued through established legal and disciplinary mechanisms rather than through public intimidation or political pressure.
The development has intensified debate in Uganda over the balance between public accountability in corruption investigations and the constitutional rights of suspects to access legal counsel without interference.
Lawyers and civil society actors have increasingly warned that attacks on defence counsel risk creating a chilling effect within the legal profession, particularly in cases involving powerful political figures and public officials.
